The Quick Scan consists of the following four (4) Themes (thematic groups).
Each theme is divided into four different attention areas (16 attention areas in total).
STEP 1. Make a selection of the attention areas (at least 5) you are interested in.
Useful tips: To create a multi-perspective on institute development, we advise the user to make this selection jointly (managers, teaching staff, administrative staff together) or discuss and agree upon selections to be made by different stakeholders.
STEP 2. Decide how to answer the questions. Jointly or as separate stakeholders?
Useful tips: According to the choice made in step 1 either use the differences of perspectives of managers, teaching staff and administrative staff, or decide to go ahead by answering from a single perspective.
STEP 3. Get sets of short statements and answer accordingly.
Useful tips: Please indicate for each of the statements presented to what degree you can agree with the statement by simply ticking the appropriate box next to each statement.
STEP 4. Get feedback report
Useful tips: To enhance good learning outcomes feedback of the quick scan will be provided to you in the form of a spider graph representing scores on specific attention areas, as well as general advice for further development in these attention areas. Scores are presented in a 4-level scale (1-4) Spider Graph. The 16 attention areas are the axes of the web; scores have the same meaning as stated in the “Quick Scan” questionnaire (4 for Completely, 3 for Largely, 2 for Somewhat, 1 for Not).
Keep in mind! Your answers will not be saved in any traceable way!
Before you continue please select from the below at least 5 attention areas you are interested in to run the Quick Scan. You can also select the default option. In that case please click SELECT ALL button and the quick scan will cover ALL attention areas. Completing the scan in this last way will take about 20 minutes of time.
The way leadership of the organisation creates the conditions for a culture of quality and continuous improvement | |
The way arrangements are made to create commitment and involvement for the institute's policy | |
The way the institute is making arrangements to assure for equal opportunities and an inclusive climate | |
The way the institute is actively engaged in the prevention of drop-out |
The way the institute is dealing with feedback information to deal with its responsibilities and achieve its mission and objectives | |
The way the institute deals with talents, skills and ambitions of teaching staff | |
The way the institute deal with employer involvement to achieve its mission and objectives, and to create attractive and up-to-date education | |
The way the examination or certification is valued by different stakeholders, especially employers and learners |
The way the institute prepares learners for making a proper choice prior to the start of a study program | |
The arrangements an institute makes to help learners to develop a career path which matches their talents | |
Arrangements the institute makes in different areas to support learners in need | |
The arrangements the institute makes to develop the international context of a profession and related transversal skills and competences of learners |
The way the institute arranges for input and feedback from the professional domain | |
Teaching methods are used which are effective, efficient and inspiring | |
The way the institute arranges for different supporting educational roles | |
The way the institute arranges for good learning conditions during apprenticeship and/or WBL |